What happened
Location matters less when power cannot arrive on time.
Grid constraint / Current
The Death of Location
A diligence brief from Open Variable Research on why the AI power crisis changes how certain land is screened, valued, and discarded.
AuthorJulian LiuFormat6-page PDF / EnglishEvidence assetsPowered Land ScorecardRevisionCurrent edition
Research areas: Technology & Industrial Systems / Commodities & Real Assets
Why it matters
A diligence brief from Open Variable Research on why the AI power crisis changes how certain land is screened, valued, and discarded.
What to watch
Interconnection evidence is specific to the site and tied to a realistic date.
Conclusion
Location matters less when power cannot arrive on time.
For a century, land was priced by location. AI demand prices it by interconnection queue position. Screening criteria that worked for forty years can now discard the wrong parcels and keep the wrong ones.
What this report helps you do
- Why old site-selection screens miss the scarce input.
- How to separate location quality from power deliverability.
- What evidence makes a parcel financeable for AI infrastructure use.
- When a good location should still be discarded.
Report preview
The old screen
Traditional location analysis emphasized access, labor, tax treatment, fiber, logistics, and market proximity. Those factors still matter, but they no longer answer the central question for AI infrastructure: can the site receive enough power on a timeline that makes the project financeable?
The new screen
The new screen starts with site-specific power evidence. Interconnection status, utility engagement, cooling feasibility, land control, permits, and equipment timing decide whether land is merely attractive or actually usable.
The value gap
When investors continue using old real-estate labels, land with verified power deliverability may be under-described, while land with weak power evidence may be over-described. The brief is built to separate those two cases.
Verification signals
- + Interconnection evidence is specific to the site and tied to a realistic date.
- + Utility, cooling, permitting, and equipment milestones support the claimed timeline.
- + Comparable transactions show a premium for verified power deliverability rather than generic data-center potential.
Disproof signals
- - Power access proves generic, conditional, or materially delayed.
- - Cooling, permitting, local opposition, or equipment lead times erase the advantage.
- - Comparable deals fail to recognize a premium for deliverable power.
Purchase
The Death of Location
One-time digital purchase for individual internal research use. Delivery and license terms are presented before checkout.
- Format
- 6-page PDF / English
- Evidence assets
- Powered Land Scorecard
- License
- Individual internal use
- Price
- $390
Secure checkout via Stripe. Invoices and team licensing are available through institutional inquiry. See delivery terms.